Please Wait...

Quantifing neocortical structural changes for clinical trials in alzheimer’s disease: Comparison between tensor-based morphometry and longditudinal freesurfer

Mehul Sampat1, Florent Roche1, Peng Yu2, Adam J Schwarz2, Joë l Schaerer1, Gennan Chan1, Boubakeur Belaroussi1, Luc Bracoud1, Joyce Suhy1, Joonmi Oh1, and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
1 BioClinica Newark, CA, USA  and Lyon, France    2 Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA

INTRODUCTION
Accurate and reliable quantification of structural brain changes, within a regulatory compliant framework, is important in clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Cortical changes relevant to AD pathology have been reported in various regions including isthmus cingulate, precuneus, inferior parietal, temporal pole and prefrontal cortex [1,2].

We report the performance of atrophy measurements for these structures using tensor-based morphometry (TBM) [3], and compare to changes in cortical volumes and thickness measured with longitudinal FreeSurfer (LFS and LFS_Th, respectively) [4] on the standardized ADNI dataset [5].

METHODS
Population and MRI Data

Baseline and Month-3 data from 20 ADNI-2 normal controls (NCs) were used for test-retest purposes (mean age of 77y with range of 67-89y).

Baseline, Month-12 and Month-24 ADNI-1 data were used to quantify percent changes for 493 subjects (99 ADs, 115 LMCI-converters, 115 LMCI-non-converters and 164 NCs).

3D T1-weighted MRI scans from the ADNI-1 and ADNI-2 database (http://adni.loni.ucla.edu) were analyzed in this study.

Image processing
Whole brain segmentation for both subcortical and cortical structures were done using FreeSurfer  (FS) v5.3 analysis suits.

Change analysis:

Pair-wise Tensor-Based Morphometry (TBM):

Assessing local expansion or compression using deformable registration and aggregate volume change over a regions of interest.

Novel implementation of log-symmetric demons algorithm with cross-correlation image similarity metric yielding deformation field that is diffeomorphic (computed Jacobians are always positive) and symmetric (reduces the likeliness of any bias in change analysis).

Each follow up visit change was measured relative to Baseline visit.

2) Global longitudinal FS:

Individual subject atlas was built using all available visits.

Statistical analysis

Absolute symmetrized percent change (ASPC) [6] was calculated to assess variability.

Generalized areas under curve (AUCs) were calculated and the DeLong test [7] was performed to compare receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves among TBM, LFS and LFS_Th methods.

Generalized AUCs were calculated by computing probability that two random subjects are properly ranked with respect to ordinal outcome with two or more levels.

Linear regression was performed to test any bias in change analysis.

RESULTS
Variability using Baseline and Month-3 scans from NCs

Mean ASPC (%) were smaller for TBM than LFS for all regions.

Algorithm comparison results using Baseline, Month-12 and Month-24 scans

Generalized AUCs

DeLong test results

Linear regression results

 

CONCLUSIONS
The TBM method successfully and reliably quantified changes over time for various cortical regions with no bias, and showed improved sensitivity to differentiate subgroups compared to LFS and LFS_Th.

A pair-wise analysis approach to quantify changes using TBM may be a useful option for clinical trial applications, considering the intrinsic limitation of LFS which needs to be run after scans from all required visits are acquired for the best outputs.

References
[1] McEvoy, et al., Radiology, 2009;251(1):195-205
[2] Greene, et al., Neurobiol Aging, 2010;31(8):1304-1311
[3] Vercauteren et al., Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv, 2008;11:754-761
[4] Fischl, et al., Cerebral Cortex, 2004;14:11-22.
[5] Wyman, et al., Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(3): 332–337
[6] Reuter, et al., Neuroimage, 2012;61(4):1402-1418
[7] DeLong, et al., Biometrics, 1988;44(3):837-845

LEARN MORE OR SPEAK WITH OUR EXPERTS

CONTACT US
Leader in Clinical Trial
Management Solutions

Successful clinical trials require the ability to see key details and uncover hidden insights. Bioclinica utilizes science and technology to bring clarity to clinical trials, helping companies to develop new life-improving therapies more efficiently and safely.

Reminder: Today's webinar on Clinical Endpoint Adjudication kicks off at 1 PM Eastern. > https://t.co/1IU9TVFCFA
bioclinica (2 days ago)
In a new go-to-guide on conducting #Alzheimer's clinical trials, @bioclinica experts Joyce Suhy, Marieke Cajal, Luc… https://t.co/SaBFm3L9CL
bioclinica (3 days ago)
Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Webinar. Join us in a live online event this Friday, (6/15) Details & reg. > https://t.co/uBjlgSMnDS
bioclinica (3 days ago)
Clinical Endpoint Adjudication webinar this Friday! Interested in establishing a universal clinical vocabulary to i… https://t.co/uPD992tSaY
bioclinica (4 days ago)
RT @Pints4PDOrlando: Amazingly grateful to @BioclinicaFLA @bioclinica for their super generous donation to @michaeljfoxorg @teamfox in our…
bioclinica (4 days ago)
RT @E_de_Azambuja: ESMO at ASCO2018: please visit booth 5078 if you want more information on ESMO activities and opportunities @myESMO #asc…
bioclinica (2 weeks ago)

Latest Blogs:

Latin America: Benefit from the Right Partner
Removing Risk from Clinical Trial Management System (CTMS) Implementations
Collaboration Between Clinical Operations and the Logistics and Supply Chain Teams is Key to Trial Success
The Value of Protocol Review
CTMS and RBM: Hot Topics at OCT Nordics in Copenhagen