Please Wait...

Quantifing neocortical structural changes for clinical trials in alzheimer’s disease: Comparison between tensor-based morphometry and longditudinal freesurfer

Mehul Sampat1, Florent Roche1, Peng Yu2, Adam J Schwarz2, Joë l Schaerer1, Gennan Chan1, Boubakeur Belaroussi1, Luc Bracoud1, Joyce Suhy1, Joonmi Oh1, and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
1 BioClinica Newark, CA, USA  and Lyon, France    2 Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA

INTRODUCTION
Accurate and reliable quantification of structural brain changes, within a regulatory compliant framework, is important in clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Cortical changes relevant to AD pathology have been reported in various regions including isthmus cingulate, precuneus, inferior parietal, temporal pole and prefrontal cortex [1,2].

We report the performance of atrophy measurements for these structures using tensor-based morphometry (TBM) [3], and compare to changes in cortical volumes and thickness measured with longitudinal FreeSurfer (LFS and LFS_Th, respectively) [4] on the standardized ADNI dataset [5].

METHODS
Population and MRI Data

Baseline and Month-3 data from 20 ADNI-2 normal controls (NCs) were used for test-retest purposes (mean age of 77y with range of 67-89y).

Baseline, Month-12 and Month-24 ADNI-1 data were used to quantify percent changes for 493 subjects (99 ADs, 115 LMCI-converters, 115 LMCI-non-converters and 164 NCs).

3D T1-weighted MRI scans from the ADNI-1 and ADNI-2 database (http://adni.loni.ucla.edu) were analyzed in this study.

Image processing
Whole brain segmentation for both subcortical and cortical structures were done using FreeSurfer  (FS) v5.3 analysis suits.

Change analysis:

Pair-wise Tensor-Based Morphometry (TBM):

Assessing local expansion or compression using deformable registration and aggregate volume change over a regions of interest.

Novel implementation of log-symmetric demons algorithm with cross-correlation image similarity metric yielding deformation field that is diffeomorphic (computed Jacobians are always positive) and symmetric (reduces the likeliness of any bias in change analysis).

Each follow up visit change was measured relative to Baseline visit.

2) Global longitudinal FS:

Individual subject atlas was built using all available visits.

Statistical analysis

Absolute symmetrized percent change (ASPC) [6] was calculated to assess variability.

Generalized areas under curve (AUCs) were calculated and the DeLong test [7] was performed to compare receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves among TBM, LFS and LFS_Th methods.

Generalized AUCs were calculated by computing probability that two random subjects are properly ranked with respect to ordinal outcome with two or more levels.

Linear regression was performed to test any bias in change analysis.

RESULTS
Variability using Baseline and Month-3 scans from NCs

Mean ASPC (%) were smaller for TBM than LFS for all regions.

Algorithm comparison results using Baseline, Month-12 and Month-24 scans

Generalized AUCs

DeLong test results

Linear regression results

 

CONCLUSIONS
The TBM method successfully and reliably quantified changes over time for various cortical regions with no bias, and showed improved sensitivity to differentiate subgroups compared to LFS and LFS_Th.

A pair-wise analysis approach to quantify changes using TBM may be a useful option for clinical trial applications, considering the intrinsic limitation of LFS which needs to be run after scans from all required visits are acquired for the best outputs.

References
[1] McEvoy, et al., Radiology, 2009;251(1):195-205
[2] Greene, et al., Neurobiol Aging, 2010;31(8):1304-1311
[3] Vercauteren et al., Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv, 2008;11:754-761
[4] Fischl, et al., Cerebral Cortex, 2004;14:11-22.
[5] Wyman, et al., Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(3): 332–337
[6] Reuter, et al., Neuroimage, 2012;61(4):1402-1418
[7] DeLong, et al., Biometrics, 1988;44(3):837-845

LEARN MORE OR SPEAK WITH OUR EXPERTS

CONTACT US
Leader in Clinical Trial
Management Solutions

Successful clinical trials require the ability to see key details and uncover hidden insights. Bioclinica utilizes science and technology to bring clarity to clinical trials, helping companies to develop new life-improving therapies more efficiently and safely.

ASCPT 2018 Annual Meeting https://t.co/i0mjYbBq5N Join @Bioclinica Research's Open House 3/22 https://t.co/citlLotbD7
bioclinica (2 days ago)
Heading to DC for DIA's #Pharmacovigilance & Risk Mgmt Strategies Conf.? Visit @Bioclinica in booth 32. Preview our… https://t.co/alU1sCg04l
bioclinica (2 days ago)
Kevin Bishop, named a 'Top Innovator' in #clinicaltrials by @CenterWatch See how we're reducing risk to the clinic… https://t.co/rXBGvIh9Wr
bioclinica (3 days ago)
RT @CenterWatch: Congratulations to all our #2018TopInovators! Read about the innovations in the #CWMonthly special edition, https://t.co/Y…
bioclinica (2 weeks ago)
RT @CenterWatch: .@Pfizer demonstrates leadership in #clinicaltrial innovation with two spots on the @CenterWatch #2018TopInnovators, https…
bioclinica (2 weeks ago)
RT @jheanne: I just contributed towards 'Joby' on https://t.co/EHt69JFLZ9 Best wishes to Joby and all our @Bioclinica team members! @Oxfam…
bioclinica (2 weeks ago)

Latest Blogs:

Removing Risk from Clinical Trial Management System (CTMS) Implementations
Collaboration Between Clinical Operations and the Logistics and Supply Chain Teams is Key to Trial Success
The Value of Protocol Review
CTMS and RBM: Hot Topics at OCT Nordics in Copenhagen